FLK1

Dispute Resolution

Dispute Resolution covers the full lifecycle of civil litigation in England and Wales, from pre-action conduct through to enforcement of judgments. The Civil Procedure Rules 1998 (CPR) and their overriding objective — dealing with cases justly and at proportionate cost — underpin everything in this topic. Questions frequently test track allocation, costs rules, interim applications, and the consequences of failing to comply with procedural rules.

Practise Dispute Resolution questions →

What FLK1 tests in Dispute Resolution

01

Pre-Action Conduct and Protocols

The Practice Direction on Pre-Action Conduct and Protocols requires parties to exchange information and attempt settlement before issuing proceedings. Specific pre-action protocols apply to personal injury, clinical negligence, construction disputes and others. Non-compliance can result in adverse costs orders.

02

Issuing and Serving Proceedings

Claim forms (N1), particulars of claim, statements of truth, service rules (deemed service dates for different methods), and the defendant's response options: acknowledgment of service, defence, Part 18 request for information, or default judgment.

03

Track Allocation

Small claims track (up to £10,000; £1,000 for personal injury and housing disrepair). Fast track (£10,000–£25,000; trial within 30 weeks). Multi-track (over £25,000 or complex cases). Consequences for costs rules differ by track.

04

Interim Applications

Summary judgment (CPR Part 24: no real prospect of success), interim injunctions (American Cyanamid principles: serious issue, balance of convenience, adequacy of damages), freezing orders, search orders, and applications for specific disclosure.

05

Costs

General rule: costs follow the event (loser pays). Costs management (budgets on multi-track). Part 36 offers and the cost consequences of beating/failing to beat an offer. Qualified one-way costs shifting (QOCS) in personal injury. Basis of assessment: standard vs indemnity.

06

Enforcement of Judgments

Methods: warrant of execution (goods), third party debt orders, attachment of earnings, charging orders over land, appointment of receiver. Choice of method depends on the debtor's assets and circumstances.

07

Alternative Dispute Resolution

Mediation, arbitration, adjudication, and expert determination. Courts encourage ADR: unreasonable refusal may result in an adverse costs order (Halsey principles). Arbitration is binding; mediation is not unless a settlement is reached.

Key cases

The cases most commonly tested in SQE1 MCQs for Dispute Resolution.

Halsey v Milton Keynes General NHS Trust [2004]

Courts cannot compel parties to mediate but unreasonable refusal can result in adverse costs orders.

Mitchell v News Group Newspapers Ltd [2013]

Set out the strict approach to relief from sanctions under CPR r.3.9 — procedural compliance is taken seriously.

Denton v TH White Ltd [2014]

Relief from sanctions: three-stage test — seriousness of breach, good reason, all circumstances. Refined Mitchell.

American Cyanamid Co v Ethicon Ltd [1975]

Test for interim injunctions: serious issue to be tried; balance of convenience; adequacy of damages as a remedy.

Ladd v Marshall [1954]

Three conditions for admitting fresh evidence on appeal: not available at trial; credible; would have affected the result.

Ready to practise Dispute Resolution?

Smart practice questions, full explanations, and key cases — all in one place.

Start free